Gender and education emerge as massive fault lines in the electorate: From the Politics Desk

Gender and education have become significant dividing lines among voters, particularly within the white demographic, according to recent analysis. In a new report, Steve Kornacki highlights how these factors create distinct political divides. Additionally, Lawrence Hurley covers an unusual criticism directed at the president by the Supreme Court's chief justice.

In the last presidential election, white voters accounted for about 71% of the electorate, a figure that has been decreasing as the nation's demographics evolve. Despite this, their numbers still surpass those of Black, Hispanic, and Asian voters significantly. Traditionally, white voters have leaned Republican, with noticeable differences based on gender and education.

The latest poll reveals a deeper division within these groups. Specifically, there is a stark contrast between white men without college degrees, who largely support Trump, and white women with college degrees, who tend to oppose him. These two groups represent 18% and 17% of voters, respectively, and have vastly different political and cultural perspectives.

The poll shows that 69% of white men without a degree view Trump favorably, while only 29% of college-educated white women share that view, highlighting a significant 79-point gap in their opinions of Trump.

In other news, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public statement criticizing President Trump and his allies for suggesting the impeachment of judges who have ruled against the administration. Roberts emphasized that impeachment is not a suitable response to judicial disagreements, which should be addressed through the appellate process.

The call for impeachment arose after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg blocked the deportation of Venezuelan migrants, prompting Trump to demand his impeachment. Following this, Rep. Brandon Gill introduced articles of impeachment against Boasberg, citing his decision as an impeachable offense.

Historically, federal judges have been removed for serious misconduct, not for their rulings. The administration's aggressive policies have led to frequent judicial interventions, causing frustration among Trump supporters and raising concerns within the judicial system.

For more updates, stay tuned to our coverage.

Back to list